Every assessee liable to pay service tax, isto take registration with service tax department. Where assessee has been providing services from multiple premises, it may obtain separate registration for each of the premises or may obtain centralized registration for all the premises take together. Tax needs to be paid under the code for which registration has been obtained.
Sometime, it could be possible that multiple registrations are obtained at the same premise by multiple entities working within a group or otherwise.
In both the scenarios, due to inadvertence or clerical error, tax could be paid under wrong code.
The error could be of the following natures:
- Assesssee having multiple registration numbers and service tax in relation to services provided from one registration number (i.e. ST001) paid in another registration no, (i.e. ST002).
- Services provided from one entity (ABC Ltd.) but service tax paid under registration code of another entity (i.e. ABC partnership firm)
- Code number transposed instead of 869 what is entered is 896.
What could be remedies in above scenarios where tax due to government has been paid albeit under wrong code?
Under the Constitution no tax can be collected other than under authority of law. There is nothing specific in the ST law which covers this type of error. . However there are two trade notices issued by different Commissionerate which have different point of views in above situations( ST law is central):
? Kochhi Commissionerate(Trade Notice No. 03/2014-ST): As per trade notice, assessee should represent (through Range &Disvision) to the Commissioner describing the nature of mistake/errors occurred along with challan and ST-3 Return copy. Also, no objection certificate should be obtained from the assessee or any other person in whose code payment has been made wrongly. Based on such certificate, request should be made to transfer the amount from wrong code to correct code
Hyderabad Commissionerate (Trade Notice No. 21/13-14): It has been clarified that there is no system available under the service tax law which permits transfer of service tax paid under wrong code to correct code. This transfer is not possible even in case of multiple registrations within single entity. It is further clarified that service tax needs to be paid by assessee under correct code and service tax wrongly paid can either be claimed as refund or adjusted against future liability as provided under Rule 6(4A) of Service Tax Rules, 1994.
As it happens, there is conflicting views on the same matter by different Commissionerate. What should assessee do?
Recently in case of Sahara India TV Network V/s. CCE Noida2016(41) S.T.R. 145(Tri.-Delhi), It has been held that when tax has been paid under wrong code of same legal entity, procedure as prescribed by Kochhi Commissionerate could be followed to adjust the amount among unit inter se as there is no revenue loss to government.
In another recent case under Central Excise in case of Devang Paper Mills Pvt Ltd & 1 vs UOI & 3 2016-TIOL-37-HC-AHM-CX, it has been held by Gujarat High Court that tax paid under wrong code of one unit could be adjusted against correct code. HC made following remarks:
Whatever be the accounting difficulty, when undisputed fact is that the petitioner did pay a certain excise duty, merely mentioning wrong code in the process, cannot result into such harsh consequence of the entire payment not being recognized as valid, incurring further liability of repayment of the basic duty with interest and penalties
Above judgments are certainly in favour of assessee and could be cited when the initial objection is made by the revenue or audit party.
Conclusion:
Though there is no provision under the law for adjustment of tax paid under incorrect code, but trade notice of Kochhi Commissionerate and above recent decisions could be helpful for assessee for seeking inter unit adjustment of tax paid.
If the amount is significant then choice to dispute taking strength from the Trade Notice + cases. The explanationmaybe ensured to be in writing ( speed post acknowledgement due) and also marked to the jurisdictional Asst. Dy Commissioner. However, if amount is small it is advisable to pay tax under correct code and write off in the books. If it is within the group then payment option is preferable is a dispute appears sure